Service Code Creation vs. Material Code Standardization

Understand the difference between service code and material standardization, and explore industry-specific use cases across India, GCC, and Far East markets.
service code material standardization

Optimizing master data is non-negotiable. Two fundamental yet distinct practices—service code material standardization lie at the heart of operational and financial efficiency.

Despite sounding technical, these processes significantly impact your bottom line, whether you’re managing pipelines, ports, hospitals, or high-rise construction. This article explores the key differences, benefits, challenges, and regional relevance of service code material standardization.

What is Service Code Creation?

Service codes represent structured identifiers for intangible activities performed by vendors or internal teams ranging from annual maintenance to asset inspection.

Key attributes include:

  • Service description
  • Unit of measurement (UOM)
  • Pricing mechanism
  • SLA and compliance elements

By applying service code material standardization, organizations avoid billing errors, gain procurement clarity, and boost vendor performance tracking.

What is Material Code Standardization?

Material codes refer to physical items like tools, equipment, or raw materials. Over time, duplicate or inconsistent entries degrade data quality, leading to overstocking and procurement inefficiencies.

Key components:

  • Noun-modifier description logic
  • Standard units of measure
  • Industry classification (e.g., UNSPSC, eCl@ss)
  • Manufacturer part numbers (MPNs)

Implementing service code material standardization helps reduce cost, streamline inventory, and eliminate duplication across ERPs.

Key Differences: Service Code vs Material Standardization

CriteriaService Code CreationMaterial Code Standardization
FocusIntangible servicesTangible materials
PurposeProcurement control for servicesData consistency for materials
Common UsersMaintenance, Procurement, FinanceEngineering, Stores, SCM
Typical FieldsTask, SLA, UOM, RateSpecs, MPN, Category, Description
ImpactVisibility & complianceInventory accuracy & spend reduction

Both are essential and interlinked. Service code material standardization is most effective when implemented across services and materials together.

Industry Use Cases

Oil & Gas

  • Service Code: ROV inspections, pipeline repair
  • Material Code: Valves, actuators, flanges
    Helps manage large-scale vendor scopes and avoid duplicate item entries across rigs or refineries.

Utilities

  • Service Code: Line inspection, emergency restoration
  • Material Code: Insulators, cable drums
    Aids in accurate contractor billing and asset traceability.

Real Estate & Construction

  • Service Code: Subcontractor labor, civil inspections
  • Material Code: Concrete grades, wiring kits
    Prevents miscommunication in BoQ vs actuals, aiding project tracking.

Healthcare & Lifesciences

  • Service Code: Facility sterilization, MRI calibration
  • Material Code: Gloves, syringes, ventilators
    Supports regulatory audits and prevents stockouts of critical items.

EPC Projects

  • Service Code: Site surveys, safety audits
  • Material Code: Electrical panels, mechanical fittings
    Reduces turnaround time and boosts compliance across international projects.

Common Challenges & How to Overcome Them

ChallengeSolution
Fragmented data across sites or regionsCentralized MDM platform with governance workflows
No clear ownership of service descriptionsAppoint service data stewards and create approval flows
Duplication due to free text entriesEnforce structured templates and AI validation checks
Lack of industry standardsMap to eCl@ss, UNSPSC, or domain-specific taxonomies
User resistance to changeEducate teams with ROI-backed training programs

Overcoming these issues with service code material standardization sets the stage for scalable digital transformation.

ROI & KPIs to Track

Organizations adopting service code material standardization see measurable impact.

Key ROI Drivers:

  • Reduced procurement cycle times
  • Decreased working capital from inventory reduction
  • Fewer invoice disputes or errors
  • Better contract compliance

Suggested KPIs:

  • % of duplicate materials/services eliminated
  • Procurement accuracy rate
  • Working capital saved via inventory optimization
  • Vendor performance metrics (SLA adherence, response time)

Technology That Enables It

Several platforms and technologies now simplify service code material standardization.

  • AI-based Deduplication Engines
    Identify duplicates, inconsistencies, and misclassified entries in real-time.
  • Standardized Taxonomy Libraries
    Support eCl@ss, UNSPSC, ISO 8000, etc., for classification consistency.
  • MDM Platforms (like PROSOL)
    Provide end-to-end master data governance, from creation to approval and integration into SAP, Oracle, Maximo, and more.
  • Data Quality Dashboards
    Visualize improvements, spot gaps, and track governance workflows.

Why You Need Both

Focusing only on services or materials creates blind spots. Integrating service code material standardization delivers:

  • Better analytics across spend categories
  • Accurate work order and job costing
  • Streamlined asset management and CMMS integration
  • Predictable maintenance and shutdown planning

Implementation Best Practices

For Service Codes

  • Start with top 100 recurring services
  • Link codes to contract SLAs
  • Avoid free-text during purchase requisitions

For Materials

  • Validate new codes against master list
  • Involve OEMs for part descriptions
  • Standardize UOMs (e.g., meters vs mtr)

A governance council with representation from procurement, maintenance, finance, and IT ensures long-term success.

Need help with cleaning up your service data? Get a personalized report on your current master data quality.

Data cleansing

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: What is service code material standardization?
It’s a unified approach to cleanse, structure, and manage both service and material master data for better procurement, compliance, and reporting.

Q2: Can I use one framework for both?
Yes. A central data governance model supports consistency, accuracy, and accountability across both data types.

Q3: How often should codes be updated?
Quarterly or whenever there are major vendor or project changes.

Q4: Does this apply to small businesses too?
Absolutely. Small teams can benefit from simplified templates and faster procurement cycles.

Q5: What tools can help?
MDM platforms like PROSOL, taxonomy libraries (e.g., eCl@ss), and AI-powered deduplication engines.

Final Thoughts

Whether you’re managing inventories in Mumbai, project sites in Muscat, or hospital assets in Singapore, a unified service code material standardization strategy is your competitive edge. It ensures data accuracy, drives procurement efficiency, and unlocks true business intelligence.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest

Thank you for your interest in CODA's offerings! To get started on your journey to success, please complete the form below

Our dedicated team will be in touch shortly to discuss your specific needs and ensure you get the most out of CODA’s solutions.